Gate keepers are virtually nonexistent and twitter can distribute to the entire world the voice of a person who was completely anonymous and powerless yesterday. Some are tangential, like the decrease of words per page in printed materials (often replaced by photos or graphics, but also
- A new set of questions about who owns rights to information
- a blurring of the lines betwween truth https://www.google.com/search?q=comic+sans+sucks
- The rising ubiquity of graphic design in all things
- A strange generational gap around font choice and perception of some rather controversial ones (e.g. comic sans).
But another interesting result or correlative change has been the fact that in a sublimated-information world, we exist in such multicultural environments that the kind of virtue signalling and membership-indicative behaviors which previously indicated fairly reliable information about a person’s relationship to a group are in no way universal.
For example: tattoos. Once only appropriate for sailors, bikers, convicts, and others whose lives were disconnected from mainstream, white, middle class America, tattoos no longer reliably represent rebellion. In fact, they do not reliably represent anything, having been embraced by nerd cultures, sports, hipsters, celebrities, business people, and many others.
How then, does a person learn to operate in a world where symbols may mean things entirely different than they may have a few years ago, or something which is opposite what you were taught?
This arose from a conversation with a friend who is currently trying to negotiate with two carpenters. The first is a paperwork-heavy, detail oriented approach to planning and creating the estimate. The second is a relationship focused, creative planner who forgets to return phone calls, but charges less and to be honest, does more beautiful work.
She and I got into quite an argument about whether the failure to return phone calls or produce incredibly detailed paper work reflected on his ability to be a superior contractor or not. I know the second guy really well, and to be perfectly honest, would put my life in his hands any day of the week. PLUS, his work is exceptional. But, yeah, he requires a little more energy because he will not step in and project manage your construction for you.
Seems unrelated doesn’t it? but in the middle of the conversation, I realized something: There was a time when it was generally true that: the accuracy rate of details can identify how much a business person cares about me and my accounts.
To some extent, that’s still true. Being on time, that matters. Getting names spelled correctly? Every time. But when information travels without any hindrance of printing, editing, and reviews, typos get through, and they do not represent the same kind of failure to attend to something real.
What does this really mean?
Honestly, I think it means we need to relearn how to communicate.